Reconsider stock period check

Support User
1

Since changeset 4d228a081908 we no longer set the effective date of a move when it is assigned. However, currently we still check if there’s an assigned move in a period before we allow to close it:

http://hg.tryton.org/modules/stock/file/tip/period.py#l126

I’m thinking that maybe the check is not correct. I see several possibilities but maybe this is the one that convinces me the most:

Check for any move that is not in ‘done’ or ‘cancel’ state and has effective_date set to a date within the period to be closed. If there’s one, we raise a warning (not an error) and let the user decide if she still wants to close the period.

Opinions?

2

I do not see why modules/stock: 4d228a081908 would make the close_period_assigned_move check invalid. Having a move assigned and planned for withing the closed period should still not be allowed.

3

It seems to me that we could “relax” the constraint. Still do not allow to set any moves as done within a closed period, but let the user ignore the warning at their expense.