The main problem with a CMS is that changes are not revievable, which for me is a drawback.
Indeed if somebody want’s to contribute to the website and it has problems with it I offer myself to help them.
The main problem with a CMS is that changes are not revievable, which for me is a drawback.
Indeed if somebody want’s to contribute to the website and it has problems with it I offer myself to help them.
Personally it is very kind from you to offer support on the current review process.
I had tried this some time ago, and decided for myself that it is too complicated if you are not using it on a daily basis. Thats why I’m not translating anymore to german for example. (Next to the fact that I don’t want to discuss about white space at the end of a line and things like that. But thats a different story)
Even in a programming context, submitting requests in OBS or Github is much easier.
For a website maintenance its a complete overkill. You’ll never be able to give some text to your secretary to put it into the Newsfeed.
Just my 2c
For a website maintenance its a complete overkill. You’ll never be able to give some text to your secretary to put it into the Newsfeed.
I can be your secreatry if you want. Just write the text and share it. And I will be very happy to upload this to the website.
Typo3 or Typo3 Neos have standard review possibilities. You create your content in the workspace and another can review, change and publish it to the website. I think it’s a bit overkill. You can test it on https://www.lelesys.com/en/technology/about-typo3-neos/typo3-neos-demo.html
Another, for me, important point is a list of contributed modules with their description and location / download on the website. Now I’m looking on for modules in the repo’s of Nan-Tic / Presik or ZikZak, but I think there are a lot more.
Another, for me, important point is a list of contributed modules with their description and location / download on the website. Now I’m looking on for modules in the repo’s of Nan-Tic / Presik or ZikZak, but I think there are a lot more.
Some time ago we discussed the plan to add a Tryton Package Index (Trypi). The idea is to upload modules to pypi (as they are python packages also) and then add an index of all the tryton packages.
Nicolas, started some application to register the packages which was uploaded to a sandbox repository. Don’t know which is the current state, but contribution is welcome to make it happen. If any body is interested, please open a new thread (here or on tryton-dev mailing list).
I have setup a initial version of the website with the new design: www.tryton.org: log
You can see it running on http://new.tryton.org/
It is a Flask application with some memory caching. It fetch the 3 last news from https://discuss.tryton.org/c/news and the three next events from Tryton calendar. They are all based on standard format: RSS and iCal, so we could change the platform as long those format are available.
To ease the deployment and the update, it is a docker image build from docker-compose. There is a cron task running every hour that run hg pull -u
and docker-compose up --build
. The main server redirect via proxy to the local docker image which is listening only on localhost:5000 (uwsgi server).
There are only the main page for now.
I like the new design for the website, it looks modern and professional. I have a few minor suggestions for improvement and/or consideration:
Possibly drop or change the “for all” from “TRYTON is business software for all, easy to use, complete and 100% Open Source.” because it just makes it sound a bit weird.
But how can we said that it is for all?
For the conjugation, I will change all the description for the form: “You …”. I think it is more personal and get the reader involved.
But how can we said that it is for all?
What about “for everyone”?
But how can we said that it is for all?
I understand your concern, so what about something like “Tryton is business software, ideal for any business, easy to use, complete and 100% open source”?
I understand your concern, so what about something like “Tryton is business software, ideal for any business, easy to use, complete and 100% open source”?
But then there are twice the term “business”.
What about: “Tryton is business software, ideal for any company size, easy to use, complete and 100% Open Source”?
But then there are twice the term “business”.
Good point.
“Tryton is business software, ideal for companies of any size, easy to use, complete and 100% Open Source”.
I have just had another look at the design for the new website.
Now that the descriptions have been updated I have noticed a few more things that I think could be slightly improved.
I also noticed that the dropdown menu for “Services” appears to be partly off the side of the page at some page sizes in my browser (Firefox 60.2.2esr).
Apart from those very minor things it is looking good!
The wording is corrected now. I send your remark about the menu to the web designer.
For information, there are also many other pages that could be reviewed.
I didn’t realize there were other pages that could be reviewed.
Is it okay to post here for each different page, or is there a better way of doing the reviews?
Is it okay to post here for each different page, or is there a better way of doing the reviews?
I think for now, it is OK. But once the website will be in production (I hope by the end of the week), it will be better to use the bugtracker.
I have had a look at the other pages now, and have quite a lot of suggestions and comments.
Sorry this reply is quite long…
footer
/success-stories
/download
/presentations
/contribute
/foundation
Other things I noticed when viewing the pages in Firefox 60.2.2esr:
On the download, presentations, and contribute pages when the page width is between about 750px and 1200px the column containing the text seems to be quite narrow compared to the content on the other pages, and also that page at smaller page widths (only around a third of the page width contains content).
On the download page, when the page is just under 1200px wide the “Launch the demo” and the table containing the username and passwords are on the same line and overlap.
On the download page the title for each section (“Try without installing”, “Docker Image”, etc.) is closer to the previous section than it is to the contents of its section.
Thanks, I fixed all of them.
Report Bugs & Issues: I suggest “If you encounter any issues, then let us know about them. Reporting bugs and issues that have not already been reported helps us maintain our high quality level.”, I found it hard to get the “be sure it is not yet known” into this without sounding off-putting.
Yes probably. I wrote this sentence when I just had to close for the x times a duplicate bugs so I was probably a little bit angry
I like the idea of Dominique to re-phrase the second carousel text from
I like the idea of Dominique to re-phrase the second carousel text from
- 100% Open Source no vendor lock-in
to- 100% Freedom no vendor lock-in
I’m so sorry but I don’t find out that Dominique opinion, anyway, IMHO, I prefer Open Source to Freedom. Freedom is closer to Free Software and Free Software is not Open Source Software.