I would like to have your views on the following question. This concerns the unit price on the receipt movement, I details (sorry it’s a bit long :-))
Detail of the evolution of the price in the reception movement (only the unit price)
Step 1: purchase confirmation
Step 2: Reception (no change)
Step 3: 1st invoice (but partial)
Movement (Point of view 1)
|some_product||2.00||60||because invoice to the PU of 2.00|
Movement (Point of view 2)
|some_product||1.96||60||((35 * 2.00) + (25 * 1.92))/60 (because of the invoice and the rest at the purchase price)|
step 4: 2nd invoice
|some_product||1.97||60||((35 * 2.00) + (25 * 1.93))/60|
As you can imagine, the discussion revolves around stage 3, because point of view 1 thinks that it is necessary to take into account only the invoices (because it may very well never have a balance invoice) and point of view 2 think that it is also necessary to take into account the lines not yet invoiced, at the purchase price, because it is very rare that a supplier “permanently” forgets an invoice but it is common to have delays.
In fact, everything depends on the time between stages 3 and 4 and what are the challenges of stock valuation.
What do you think ?