For me your wording is ambiguous.
My understanding is that if the expected rows of ‘%_vat’ records is returned, then I my migration is complete.
In my case, I used to have ro_cif, now I have ro_vat, which according to my understanding means complete migration.
Is my understanding correct?
The migration of party_identifier is completed.
But not the migration for field party.configuration on identifier_types.
If use that configuration method and you make this query: select identifier_types from party.configuration
you will see the ro_cf instead of ro_vat.
So if you take a look at any party form view in the identifiers tab you will see ‘ro_cf’ instead of the typical ‘Romanian VAT Number’.
As you can see on the MR, the problem was a missing save on the migration for party.configuration.
I remember getting some errors while updating I fixed it manually as I presumed that I had missed some step of the upgrade. Thank you for the clarification.