Shortcomings in adding/replacing products in incoming shipments

[pokoli (Sergi Almacellas Abellana)]

@risto3

This is indeed the case. Actually, it is not ‘processed’ but ‘in process’…
The processing has not, and can not, yet be completed.

It’s a real-world situation… even in processing state, orders should be amendable.
Once revision history is maintained, why limit artificially its use?

I’ve explained the current behaviour, what you explained will be availble when the Amendment for Sale and Purchase blueprint is explemented.