# Tax identifier configuration values not migrated
**URL:** https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424
**Category:** Developer
**Tags:** party
**Created:** [July 3, 2024, 11:50am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424 "2024-07-03T11:50:27Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@acaubet](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/acaubet)
#### Post date: [July 3, 2024, 11:50am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424/1 "2024-07-03T11:50:27Z")
In this version migration, there’s also an [automatic migration](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton/tryton/-/blob/f41c9c208d399be7f07c1e3b7c3cc3704880e055/modules/party/party.py#L815) from some [identifers](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton/tryton/-/blob/f41c9c208d399be7f07c1e3b7c3cc3704880e055/modules/party/party.py#L454) to `_vat` suffix identifier.
With a lot of certainty, you will be missing the new \_vat identifier on your party configuration `identifier_types` field.
You can check the ones needed to pick running this query:
```auto
select type from party_identifier where type like '%_vat' group by 1;
```
Otherwise you will have invalid domain records.
---
### Author:  [@acaubet](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/acaubet)
#### Post date: [July 3, 2024, 12:17pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424/2 "2024-07-03T12:17:01Z")
A problem with saving the migration was causing this, here is the issue and MR:
> **[Migration replace identifiers on configuration not completed (#13387) · Issues...](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton/tryton/-/issues/13387)**
>
> As explained on https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424. The migration for replace\_vat was not completed on the configuration. This is due to a missing...
---
### Author:  [@dotbit](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/dotbit)
#### Post date: [July 3, 2024, 12:56pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424/3 "2024-07-03T12:56:49Z")
> [@acaubet](#):
>
> You can check the ones needed to pick running this query:
>
> ```auto
> select type from party_identifier where type like '%_vat' group by 1;
>
> ```
For me your wording is ambiguous.
My understanding is that if the expected rows of ‘%\_vat’ records is returned, then I my migration is complete.
In my case, I used to have ro\_cif, now I have ro\_vat, which according to my understanding means complete migration.
Is my understanding correct?
---
### Author:  [@acaubet](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/acaubet)
#### Post date: [July 3, 2024, 1:16pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424/4 "2024-07-03T13:16:30Z")
The migration of party\_identifier is completed.
But not the migration for field `party.configuration` on `identifier_types`.
If use that configuration method and you make this query:
`select identifier_types from party.configuration`
you will see the `ro_cf` instead of `ro_vat`.
So if you take a look at any party form view in the identifiers tab you will see ‘ro\_cf’ instead of the typical ‘Romanian VAT Number’.
As you can see on the MR, the problem was a missing save on the migration for party.configuration.
---
### Author:  [@dotbit](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/dotbit)
#### Post date: [July 3, 2024, 1:52pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424/5 "2024-07-03T13:52:04Z")
I remember getting some errors while updating I fixed it manually as I presumed that I had missed some step of the upgrade. Thank you for the clarification.
---
### Author:  [@system](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [July 4, 2024, 1:52am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/tax-identifier-configuration-values-not-migrated/7424/6 "2024-07-04T01:52:44Z")
This topic was automatically closed 12 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.