# Supplier shipments: effective date vs planned date

**URL:** https://discuss.tryton.org/t/supplier-shipments-effective-date-vs-planned-date/2771
**Category:** User
**Tags:** purchasing
**Created:** [May 26, 2020, 7:37am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/supplier-shipments-effective-date-vs-planned-date/2771 "2020-05-26T07:37:52Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pokoli](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/user_avatar/discuss.tryton.org/pokoli/32/22_2.png) [@pokoli](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/pokoli)
#### Post date: [May 26, 2020, 7:57am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/supplier-shipments-effective-date-vs-planned-date/2771/2 "2020-05-26T07:57:29Z")

</div>

The effective date is used to represent when the shipment is really received (thus it may be diferent from the planned\_date). Having a planned does not mean that the shipment should be received on this date:  
For example I may have a shipment planned for yesterday but not received until today.

Normally Tryton expects the user to enter data is realtime, so when you do a move it’s effective date is set to today. But we allow the user to edit the effective date just in case he is encoding moves done in a diferent date.

I think this behaviour is correct and it should not be changed.

There is the plan to prevent [setting efective dates on the future.](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/user-mistakes-when-introducing-dates-in-different-forms/2738/5)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/supplier-shipments-effective-date-vs-planned-date/2771)._
