# REST API for user application
**URL:** https://discuss.tryton.org/t/rest-api-for-user-application/6157
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [May 17, 2023, 7:46am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/rest-api-for-user-application/6157 "2023-05-17T07:46:54Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 2
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [April 5, 2026, 1:48pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/rest-api-for-user-application/6157/21 "2026-04-05T13:48:17Z")
> [@ced](#):
>
> Ideally it would be good if the author of `httpx` which seems to be interested only on `httpnext` this days, would transfer the project to people who are willing to maintain it.
Indeed it already happened with [https://httpxyz.org/](https://httpxyz.org/) but I think we should restraint for now to depend on it because they do similar trick as niquests with urllib3 but at least only to put their fork and also because they [do not push yet to migrate](https://httpxyz.org/).
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [April 20, 2026, 6:00am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/rest-api-for-user-application/6157/22 "2026-04-20T06:00:11Z")
This topic was automatically closed after 10 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2026, 8:12am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/rest-api-for-user-application/6157/23 "2026-05-22T08:12:53Z")
And now we have [httpx2](https://github.com/pydantic/httpx2). So I’m still in favor of wait and see until major dependencies make their choice.
[Previous page](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/rest-api-for-user-application/6157.md?page=1)