# Regression since OpenERP - Tryton doesn't use product's "\[code\] name" for invoice move lines in GL

**URL:** https://discuss.tryton.org/t/regression-since-openerp-tryton-doesnt-use-products-code-name-for-invoice-move-lines-in-gl/1325
**Category:** User
**Tags:** purchasing
**Created:** [April 15, 2019, 1:56pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/regression-since-openerp-tryton-doesnt-use-products-code-name-for-invoice-move-lines-in-gl/1325 "2019-04-15T13:56:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![risto3](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/a87d85/32.png) [@risto3](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/risto3)
#### Post date: [April 15, 2019, 1:56pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/regression-since-openerp-tryton-doesnt-use-products-code-name-for-invoice-move-lines-in-gl/1325/1 "2019-04-15T13:56:41Z")

</div>

Sudden panic, in the haste of getting Tryton into production, we completely zapped a very important detail where the GL is void of purchasing’s invoice lines’ descriptions where in OpenERP we always had the product ‘[code] name’. We now holding back on posting for the moment, but jan-feb is already posted:-(

In Tryton it is blank since the description is blank for the vast majority of purchases.

Since the origin seems okay, I wonder if simply adapting the GL report to convert to text the origin if the description is empty seems to be a sensible workaround, but I wonder if the same should be used in when posting the invoice (that is, when description is empty).

Actually, I would even argue that it should always be used as such, since the product description is mainly for partner communication, _not_ accounting.

Similar issue with the invoice description itself.

Any body else come across this? Solution chosen?
