Matching existing move lines on statement lines

[ced (Cédric Krier)]

@albert

For example, if you have one and only one invoice of 12.723,33€ and you have a transaction in the bank with that amount. The probability that the transaction corresponds to the payment of the invoice is extremely high.

I’m strongly against to implement such weak logic in Tryton.
The troubles of matching with the wrong party is immense.

@albert

However, the next time you get a bank transfer from the same customer we can look at the previous ones

The simplest way is to create a statement rule.
But it may be better to have a “special” kind of rule that is able to search in the past relation made by the user between raw data and target. This would avoid to create too much rules.
(see Improve statement rule party matching - #7 by ced).