# Management of service purchases

**URL:** <https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296>\
**Category:** User\
**Created:** [May 27, 2022, 7:51am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296 "2022-05-27T07:51:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![2cadz](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/user_avatar/discuss.tryton.org/2cadz/32/130_2.png) [@2cadz](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/2cadz)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2022, 7:51am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296/1 "2022-05-27T07:51:45Z")

</div>

Hi,

How to manage purchases of services linked to sales of these same services in Tryton?  
Is there a way to create a purchase request when confirming the sales order?

Regards

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hobbes](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/a698b9/32.png) [@hobbes](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/hobbes)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2022, 12:50pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296/2 "2022-05-29T12:50:22Z")

</div>

if you have to buy them to sell them, I would make them products, not services, and use the stock management facilities like for any other product.

I think that service is more for services that you provide yourself, for which stock is not managed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ced](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/user_avatar/discuss.tryton.org/ced/32/1237_2.png) [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 7:27am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296/3 "2022-05-30T07:27:44Z")

</div>

I do not think it is a good advise to manage services as goods.

I see not problem to use `sale_supply` with services but the sale will not wait for the purchase to invoice the service. At least not until [Add module to allow services to be invoiced when they are done (#9999) · Issues · Tryton / Tryton · GitLab](https://bugs.tryton.org/issue9999) is developed and the same module for purchase is created.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![2cadz](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/user_avatar/discuss.tryton.org/2cadz/32/130_2.png) [@2cadz](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/2cadz)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 9:12am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296/4 "2022-05-30T09:12:35Z")

</div>

> [@ced](#):
>
> I do not think it is a good advise to manage services as goods.

I think so too.

> [@ced](#):
>
> I see not problem to use `sale_supply` with services but the sale will not wait for the purchase to invoice the service. At least not until [Issue 9999: Add module to allow services to be invoiced when they are done - Tryton issue tracker](https://bugs.tryton.org/issue9999) is developed and the same module for purchase is created.

Ok, thanks, I’ll look over there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hobbes](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/a698b9/32.png) [@hobbes](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/hobbes)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 3:39pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296/5 "2022-05-30T15:39:40Z")

</div>

> [@ced](#):
>
> I do not think it is a good advise to manage services as goods.

why ? (see below for a more developed question)

> [@ced](#):
>
> I see not problem to use `sale_supply` with services but the sale will not wait for the purchase to invoice the service. At least not until [Issue 9999: Add module to allow services to be invoiced when they are done - Tryton issue tracker](https://bugs.tryton.org/issue9999) is developed and the same module for purchase is created.

especially since tryton can’t yet handle a «pure service» flow gracefully until that’s developed, what’s wrong with using goods stock management to track services that you resell ? You do have order, purchase, somehow a deliverable that starts the invoicing process,… I agree that it would be better to use a pure service flow, but since it’s not there (yet), what’s the problem with bending the available facilities in the meantime ?

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pokoli](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/user_avatar/discuss.tryton.org/pokoli/32/22_2.png) [@pokoli](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/pokoli)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2022, 7:25am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296/6 "2022-05-31T07:25:35Z")

</div>

> [@hobbes](#):
>
> I agree that it would be better to use a pure service flow, but since it’s not there (yet), what’s the problem with bending the available facilities in the meantime ?

I think you answered yourself pretty well.  
If there is not there yet using a workarround like you suggested will not make it available faster.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ced](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/user_avatar/discuss.tryton.org/ced/32/1237_2.png) [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2022, 8:42am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296/7 "2022-05-31T08:42:51Z")

</div>

> [@hobbes](#):
>
> what’s wrong with using goods stock management to track services that you resell ?

Because goods have a different accounting than service (often the taxes). Also with the goods you have inventory, cost of goods, shipping cost, landed cost etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/uploads/default/original/1X/c6f8ec0a40525cdcd50058c734283450a4b3d38b.png) [@system](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2022, 8:43am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/management-of-service-purchases/5296/8 "2022-06-30T08:43:39Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
