# Is there anybody caring about Spanish modules?
**URL:** https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094
**Category:** Organisation
**Created:** [February 12, 2026, 2:44pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094 "2026-02-12T14:44:09Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [February 12, 2026, 2:44pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/1 "2026-02-12T14:44:09Z")
For several years now, I’m complaining about the state of the Spanish modules ([`account_es`](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton/tryton/-/issues/13654) and [`account_es_sii`](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton/tryton/-/issues/12277)).
The only people who show interest and try to contribute, does not want to follow the requirements nor the guidance that I consider vital to be able for the community to maintain them. Only short-term fixes are proposed.
So I would like to know who is actually using them? And which features? What would be the impact for you of the removal?
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [February 12, 2026, 2:44pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/2 "2026-02-12T14:44:37Z")
---
### Author:  [@pokoli](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/pokoli)
#### Post date: [February 12, 2026, 3:08pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/3 "2026-02-12T15:08:52Z")
Please remove it for 8.0 series! Currently the current modules are badly maintained and we can not create another version unless the official one is removed. This is clearly shown as there are a lot of issues pending to be merged or reviewed.
We (KOPEN) will maintain it by ourselves and end up this never ending drama. We will take care of making the code public and releasing it as we did with some other spanish modules like [verifactu](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton-community/modules/account_es_verifactu) or [facturae](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton-community/modules/edocument_es_facturae). Of course whoever who want is welcome to share efforts on it the maintenance.
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [February 12, 2026, 3:15pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/4 "2026-02-12T15:15:33Z")
> [@pokoli](#):
>
> Please remove it for 8.0 series! Currently the current modules are badly maintained and we can not create another version unless the official one is removed.
This is irrelevant for the discussion.
> [@pokoli](#):
>
> We (KOPEN) will maintain it by ourselves
Good for you but this is neither relevant.
---
### Author:  [@josesalvador](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/josesalvador)
#### Post date: [February 12, 2026, 4:06pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/5 "2026-02-12T16:06:35Z")
I am not doing any development of any type for Tryton since a lot, however, as a user, I use account\_es to have accountability and present taxes. Not having that modules in Tryton will make me move to another ERP.
I do not see the point in doing that. I would like to see Tryton grow in users and countries, not losing them.
My two cents.
---
### Author:  [@sergyo](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/sergyo)
#### Post date: [February 12, 2026, 4:16pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/6 "2026-02-12T16:16:15Z")
We use both. However, because they lack the latest regulatory updates in their reports and have unapproved issues, we’ve had to fork or patch them.
IMHO, the current situation should be unlocked. Perhaps a solution for now would be to move the projects from the Foundation to tryton-community and work there improving them; with the aim of returning to the Foundation in near future.
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [February 12, 2026, 4:41pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/7 "2026-02-12T16:41:24Z")
> [@josesalvador](#):
>
> I do not see the point in doing that. I would like to see Tryton grow in users and countries, not losing them.
For that we need contributors and contributors that are following the Tryton best practices.
> [@sergyo](#):
>
> Perhaps a solution for now would be to move the projects from the Foundation to tryton-community and work there improving them; with the aim of returning to the Foundation in near future.
I do not see why nor how developing outside the standard workflow will make the module magically more compliant with the standard and bast practice.
For me the only valid goal of developing outside is to not respect the them.
Also where are the contributors who are willing to improve those modules toward the Tryton standards?
---
### Author:  [@pokoli](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/pokoli)
#### Post date: [February 12, 2026, 11:48pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/8 "2026-02-12T23:48:11Z")
> [@ced](#):
>
> Also where are the contributors who are willing to improve those modules toward the Tryton standards?
They are tired of having useless discussions or just maintaining their own forks because of issuses are not fixed in Tryton standards.
---
### Author:  [@oscarQ](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/oscarQ)
#### Post date: [February 13, 2026, 6:53am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/9 "2026-02-13T06:53:29Z")
We’re currently using the Spanish accounting modules in our company. So far they’ve been meeting our requirements without major issues.
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [February 13, 2026, 7:40am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/10 "2026-02-13T07:40:57Z")
> [@pokoli](#):
>
> They are tired of having useless discussions
By “they” I guess you are just talking about you.
The problem is that you do not accept the requirement and you keep pushing for your way. So you are the one how have useless discussions.
---
### Author:  [@pokoli](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/pokoli)
#### Post date: [February 13, 2026, 8:03am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/11 "2026-02-13T08:03:44Z")
> [@ced](#):
>
> The problem is that you do not accept the requirement and you keep pushing for your way.
That’s not true, I completly accept your requeriments but I’ve always comented in several ways:
- Descriebing what I think it should be a problem (for example like [here](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton/tryton/-/issues/13654#note_500372) which lead to this discussion)
- Trying to find solutions that may solve the current problem. (Like for example [here](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton/tryton/-/issues/12277#note_368125))
I see the benefit of your comments and I understand your concerns. But I do not fully that what you request is the best solution for the community so probably this make you think that I do not accept the requirements.
I always try to understand the reasoning behaing your word and try to understand the reasons of your request. You should try to do the same when others have different opinions than yours.
---
### Author:  [@pokoli](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/pokoli)
#### Post date: [February 13, 2026, 8:07am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/12 "2026-02-13T08:07:27Z")
> [@ced](#):
>
> By “they” I guess you are just talking about you.
Of course, did you see anyone else trying to maintain the Spanish modules in core? Did you thought why nobody else is trying to contribute? There is a lot more people tryting to contribute to spanish modules, just have a look at the verifactu which is quite new and had been contributed by several people:
> **[Contributor analytics · Tryton Community / modules / account\_es\_verifactu ·...](https://foss.heptapod.net/tryton-community/modules/account_es_verifactu/-/graphs/branch%2Fdefault?ref_type=heads)**
>
> Heptapod FOSS public service
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [February 13, 2026, 8:07am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/13 "2026-02-13T08:07:34Z")
> [@josesalvador](#):
>
> I use account\_es to have accountability and present taxes
> [@oscarQ](#):
>
> We’re currently using the Spanish accounting modules in our company.
So I guess both of you are not using the AEAT nor SII features but only the chart of accounts and the taxes.
---
### Author:  [@oscarQ](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/oscarQ)
#### Post date: [February 13, 2026, 8:14am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/14 "2026-02-13T08:14:39Z")
You are right. We handle those externally for now, but we are looking forward to integrating them into our Tryton workflow at some point.
Also we’ve just started using the community modules Verifactu and Facturae and we are very happy with them; many thanks to @pokoli for promoting them as they are very useful. We also hope to start contributing to their improvement and maintenance soon.
---
### Author:  [@sergyo](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/sergyo)
#### Post date: [February 13, 2026, 3:03pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/15 "2026-02-13T15:03:36Z")
> [@ced](#):
>
> I do not see why nor how developing outside the standard workflow will make the module magically more compliant with the standard and bast practice.
> For me the only valid goal of developing outside is to not respect the them.
It’s your opinion, for me in some situations is good to take one step backward to take two forward later.
Indeed right now the situation is really stuck.
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [February 13, 2026, 3:36pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/16 "2026-02-13T15:36:10Z")
> [@sergyo](#):
>
> It’s your opinion, for me in some situations is good to take one step backward to take two forward later.
Every attempt to incorporate existing external module has failed. The main reason is that once the code exists, the author does not want (or have the resources) to change it during the review process. And also the review process will request smaller/reduced feature first but the author will not want to break it.
So once a module is gone, it is lost for ever.
> [@sergyo](#):
>
> Indeed right now the situation is really stuck.
Because nobody takes care of fixing it and this time I do not take the responsibility nor take from my free time because I have no interest in it nor enough knowledge.
---
### Author:  [@josesalvador](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/josesalvador)
#### Post date: [February 14, 2026, 11:29am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/17 "2026-02-14T11:29:03Z")
I am not using SII feature but some AEAT reports. I have to fix some of them manually before to present taxes to authorities.
I am using the account\_es Tryton standard module.
---
### Author:  [@pokoli](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/pokoli)
#### Post date: [February 16, 2026, 1:11pm UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/18 "2026-02-16T13:11:25Z")
> [@ced](#):
>
> Because nobody takes care of fixing it and this time I do not take the responsibility nor take from my free time because I have no interest in it nor enough knowledge.
So if nobody is taking care of the modules I think its better to just remove them and do not give the false feeling that this part of the software is maintained.
Better to have nothing that something broken
---
### Author:  [@ced](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/ced)
#### Post date: [March 2, 2026, 8:42am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/19 "2026-03-02T08:42:19Z")
Here is one more complain: [Non all taxes should be afected by deductible tax rate (#14133) · Issues · Tryton / Tryton · GitLab](https://bugs.tryton.org/14133)
---
### Author:  [@pokoli](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/pokoli)
#### Post date: [March 2, 2026, 10:29am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094/20 "2026-03-02T10:29:49Z")
What is the objective of such complaint collection? To create a list of complains or to just move the topic forward and provide solutions?
For me after two weeks are on the same point as when we started the discussion.
This is the reason for what I’m said:
> [@pokoli](#):
>
> Currently the current modules are badly maintained
Current situation is nothing is moving forward no mather what we do.
[Next page](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/is-there-anybody-caring-about-spanish-modules/9094.md?page=2)