# Infrastructure Overview

**URL:** https://discuss.tryton.org/t/infrastructure-overview/4859
**Category:** Organisation
**Created:** [December 15, 2021, 8:16am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/infrastructure-overview/4859 "2021-12-15T08:16:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![yangoon](https://discuss-cdn.tryton.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/y/67e7ee/32.png) [@yangoon](https://discuss.tryton.org/u/yangoon)
#### Post date: [December 16, 2021, 8:54am UTC](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/infrastructure-overview/4859/3 "2021-12-16T08:54:11Z")

</div>

> [@pokoli](#):
>
> AFAIK is still pending to be done. It should be public when done.

As there is [ongoing discussion about budget](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/improving-contribute-guides/4853/13): I think it is really important to get this done. The [Foundation Budget for 2021](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/foundation-budget-for-2021/3861) has made a supposedly sensible prioritization for the budget points. When aiming for more budget the points already covered by sponsoring should be settled first.

- Several incidents (e.g. floods in Liege) have shown that it is a quite vital requirement.
- It was intended to be used _to get offers for the infrastructure maintenance for next year_. We are quite late…
- Besides that it could have served as another meaningful base in the decision process about the future of the codereview tool. A decision that apparently was already taken, but that is not reflected on nor a compelling result of [Taking care of infrastructure](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/taking-care-of-infrastructure-code-review/3641/).

I think it can be an inhibiting factor to get more sponsors in the boat as long as funded items are not dealt with.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.tryton.org/t/infrastructure-overview/4859)._