Guess a bug report is in order as this breaks the prior 30day clause
For example, if the invoice date is 31/03 then 30d the 10th will return 10/04 (10 days ) instead of 10/05
Another simple user case that does not work as a user would expect:
A Payment Term defined to be reached Day of Month 5.
From day 1 to 5 of the same month the result is the result expected:
Invoice date: 2020-07-01 -> Due: 2020-07-05
For the rest of the month the result is not the result expected (overdue date):
Invoice date: 2020-07-06 -> Due: 2020-07-05
User would expect in this case:
Invoice date: 2020-07-06 -> Due: 2020-08-05
This is doable:
- -5 days (or -6)
- +1 months
- 5 day
1 Like
Wow!
It works!!! And the most important thing: I understand why.
Thank you @ced
Only one thing: Why do we need -6 days? Using only -5 days works even for leap years.
And if you will like to apply a delta to the days, you can do it by including it on the +1 months. So for example if you want to apply to pay on 30D + day 5 you should do:
- -5 days
- +1 month + 30 D
- 5 day
So we the missing feature is specifing multiple payment days on the same month.
1 Like
It depends if you want the invoice posted on 5th to be due the same day or the next month.
1 Like
Got it!
Itâs already perfectly clear for me.
Thank you.